Negotiating the shareholders agreement for a growth capital investment
If you are not familiar with some of the terms used in this resource, we recommend taking a look at our Understanding growth capital term sheets resource.
Once a term sheet is agreed and during the course of due diligence, investors will provide a first draft of the proposed shareholders agreement.
Part of the scope for your appointed law firm will be to review the proposed shareholders agreement and ensure that it reflects the terms agreed in the term sheet.
What is the shareholders agreement?
Also known as the subscription agreement or the investment agreement, the shareholders agreement sets out the commercial and legal terms of the round, including how the company and its investors will interact.
Unlike the articles of association, the shareholders agreement is not a constitutional document and therefore does not have to be made public. It may contain information and terms that you consider to be commercially sensitive and prefer to keep confidential.
Parties to the agreement will be:
- The company
- The new investors
- Key members of the management team, which may include key directors, employee-shareholders and the warrantors
- Newly appointed Non Executive Directors, that are joining the Board as part of the transaction.
Terms that are included in the shareholders agreement
- Sums invested
- Classes of share
- Commercial terms attached to classes of share
- Warranties
- Information rights
- Investor consents
- Restrictive covenants
- Option scheme
- Fees
Negotiation of the shareholders agreement
It is typical for several drafts of the shareholders agreement to pass between both sets of lawyers before the final draft is agreed. We recommend staying close to this process so that you are aware of any points of a commercial nature and can provide your position. The term sheet is used as a guide, but remember that it is not legally binding and therefore it is possible to propose changes.
In negotiating any equity investment, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that you are entering into a long term partnership with the new investor, and not selling the business, for example. As a result, alignment is important and protracted negotiation on minor points may be damaging and could impact the likelihood of completion or a successful partnership.
Points to be aware of
Here are a number of key points that are often discussed specifically during negotiation of the shareholders agreement:
Warranties and warranty liability caps
The company and certain members of the management team will be required to provide warranties. The list of warranties is included within the Shareholders Agreement. It may be that additional warranties are added by the investor through the course of due diligence – particularly if any concerns are raised. It is important to understand what each of the warranties means and if there are any that you are not prepared to give, then ask your lawyer to propose a caveat, carve out, or to disclose certain information against those specific warranties in the disclosure letter.
Warranty liability caps set out the maximum amount of money the company or individual is liable to pay in the event that the investor makes a claim under the warranties.
Where this cap is set depends on the investor and each individual warrantor, but they are often a subject of discussion as certain members of management may feel uncomfortable about their liability.
There are a few guiding principles that investors use when proposing liability caps:
- The cap should be sufficiently high to encourage the individual to consider the warranties carefully and make the appropriate disclosures
- It should take into account the shareholding that the individual holds and if they are receiving any cash out as part of the transaction. If they hold no, or a very small proportion of the equity and they are not selling any of their shares as part of the transaction, then their liability cap may be lower, or even nil.
- The company’s liability cap is ordinarily linked to the total size of the investment.
Investor consents
The shareholders agreement will set out any investor consent items, i.e. actions or matters for which investor consent must be sought.
This is necessary for minority investors who do not hold a controlling equity stake and therefore cannot exert this influence through their shareholding alone.
They require the ability to veto certain decisions in case they are excluded from them.
It is important to note that consent items are often those of key strategic importance to the company and its growth. The list is not intended to be an indication of the items that the investor wishes to veto, but instead the decisions that the investor would not want to be excluded from. They may be used as a guide as to decisions that should be discussed at board meetings.
The consents will likely include certain thresholds that should be set accordingly for your business.
Completion of the shareholders agreement
Once all terms are agreed, the shareholders agreement is signed by the relevant parties and dated on completion of the transaction, and from then on becomes legally binding on the parties to it.
Why do some companies have two shareholders agreements?
It is common practice in the US, and occasionally in the UK, for companies that undergo multiple successive funding rounds to have two agreements: a shareholders agreement and a subscription agreement.
The two documents essentially split the shareholders agreement in two – the shareholders agreement acts as an umbrella agreement while each subscription agreement governs a particular round.
This is designed to avoid the need to negotiate and draft an entirely new shareholders agreement each time a fundraise is undertaken.
The shareholders agreement contains the investor rights, such as information rights, warranties, investor consents and restrictive covenants.
The subscription agreement contains only the specific terms and mechanics of that particular round.
This approach can work well provided that the umbrella shareholders agreement is sufficiently sophisticated such that investors in subsequent rounds are happy to agree to their terms without significant amendments.